Developed export markets for lumber, hydropower, and iron ore have contributed to Sweden’s advanced economy. These are the backbone of a globally-oriented economy’s resources. Automobiles, telephones, pharmaceuticals, industrial machinery, precision equipment, chemical goods, home goods and appliances, forestry, iron, and steel are some of the most important industries.
Sweden Economy In Europe 2023 [Facts & History]
Over half of Sweden’s population has always been working in the country’s thriving agricultural sector. Companies like Ericsson, ASEA/ABB, SKF, Alfa Laval, AGA, and Dyno Nobel are examples of the Swedish engineering, mine, steel, and pulp sectors’ continued development and international competitiveness.
Read Also: Iceland Economy In Europe [Facts & History]
The economy of Sweden is a diverse one, open to competition. Many Swedish businesses are privately held and dedicated toward profit. A robust welfare state is also present, with government spending making up as much as 80% of GDP. Twenty-four percent of the country’s wealth was in government hands in 2014.
Read Also: Denmark Economy In Europe [Facts & History]
Being a neutral nation during WWII meant that Sweden did not suffer the same economic and banking collapse as many other European countries. Using a combination of high-tech business and generous welfare programs, Sweden has reached a very high quality of life.
When compared to other countries’ incomes, Sweden’s overall tax revenue is second only to that of Denmark. Total tax receipts were down to 48.3% of GDP in 2012 from 48.7% in 2006.
The National Institute of Economic Research forecasted GDP growth of 1.8% in 2014, 3.1% in 2015, and 3.4% in 2016. Baltic nations, Poland, and Slovakia are the only countries in the European Union predicted to maintain comparable or greater growth rates in the next years than they have in the past.
Read Also: Norway Economy In Europe [Facts & History]
Sweden Capital Investments
After WWII, Sweden developed an economic paradigm that included heavy collaboration between the state, labor organizations, and businesses. The high taxes in Sweden, which amount to close to half of the GDP, are used to pay for the country’s generous and universal social benefits system.
A fast surge in lending helped fuel a real estate and financial bubble in the 1980s. The bubble burst in the early 1990s due to a combination of factors, including a change in tax policy meant to highlight low inflation and a global economic recession at the time.
Sweden experienced its worst economic crisis since the 1930s between 1990 and 1993 when GDP dropped by 5% and unemployment surged. It was determined in a 1992 study published in Computer Sweden that, with the exception of the financial and banking sector, which was responsible for triggering the crisis, investment in IT and computing equipment fell dramatically.
Early as 1993, previous levels of spending on IT and computers were reinstated.
When the fixed exchange rate of the currency was threatened in 1992, the central bank temporarily increased interest rates to 500%, an action that ultimately failed. During the crisis, the number of people working in all sectors dropped by over 10%.
In the real estate industry, the boom eventually turned into a bust. Nearly a quarter of banking assets were taken over by the government at a cost of about four percent of GDP. The Stockholm Solution was a popular name for this arrangement.
The US Federal Reserve stated in 2007 that “Sweden had one of Europe’s greatest per capita incomes in the early 1970s, but today it ranks towards the bottom of the continent.
Consequently, there is no truly happy ending to a financial crisis, even if it is handled well “.
Sweden Economic Crash
Falling GDP decreased employment, and higher welfare payments made it impossible to maintain the rapidly expanding welfare system that had been in place since the 1970s. The federal deficit in 1994 was almost 15% of GDP. The government’s answer was to reduce spending and implement a slew of changes aimed at making Sweden more competitive.
Sweden was able to recover from the recession when the global economy brightened and the country was well-positioned to take advantage of the rapid expansion of the information technology industry.
Some people believe that the crisis of the 1990s signaled the end of the much-touted Swedish welfare model known as “Svenska Modellen,” or “The Swedish Model,” because it showed that the high levels of government spending seen in Sweden before were unsustainable in a global free market.
Read Also: Germany Economy In Europe [Facts & History]
The exceptional circumstances that prevailed in Sweden after World War II, protecting the Swedish economy at a time when its competitors’ economies were weak, were responsible for many of the Swedish Model’s lauded benefits.
On the other hand, the reforms of the 1990s appear to have established a template wherein generous social benefits can be sustained in a globally integrated economy.
Sweden’s unemployment rate in the 1980s was consistently lower than that of most European countries, hovering between 2 and 3 percent of the labor force.
However, this came with high and rising inflation.
It was clear that the low unemployment rate in the 1980s and 1990s could not be maintained, and a sharp surge to over 8% occurred during the severe crisis of the early 1990s. The government’s target unemployment rate of 4% by the year 2000 was set in 1996.
Sweden Economy Growth
Employment increased by 90,000 in 2000, the largest growth in 40 years; the target was reached by the fall of that year. In the same autumn, the government announced its new goal: by 2004, 80% of the population in the prime of their working lives will be employed.
Concerns have been raised that achieving the employment goal could lead to excessive wage rises and, consequently, higher inflation. The unemployment rate in Sweden exceeded the government’s target of 4% in August 2006. Some jobless people are locked up in “labor market political activities,” or “AMS-tgärder,” though.
Read Also: Serbia Economy In Europe [Facts & History]
Ex-unionist Jan Edling claims that the government and the Swedish Trade Union Confederation are hiding the true extent of the unemployment rate in the country. In his research, Edling noted that another 3 percent of Swedes were employed outside of the commercial sector but in state-run job programs.
According to his numbers, 700,000 Swedes are on long-term sick leave or have retired early. Edling wants to know how many of them are actually out of work.
The “real” unemployment rate, according to his findings, is close to 20%. Those who disagree with the concept of “actual” unemployment, often known as “broad unemployment,” points out that it does not account for those who would prefer to be working, such as students who would rather have a job, people on sick leave, and military conscripts.
In June 2013, the unemployment rate in Sweden was 9.1% for the entire population and 29.0% for those between the ages of 15 and 25.
Read Also: Belarus Economy In Europe [Facts & History]
Sweden has a diverse economy with an emphasis on exports thanks to the country’s advanced distribution network, top-notch domestic and international communications, and highly educated workforce.
An economy that relies significantly on international trade has its foundation in timber, hydropower, and iron ore. Half of Sweden’s GDP and its exports come from the engineering industry. The telecommunications, auto and pharmaceutical industries are also crucial.
Two percent of the economy and jobs are supported by the agricultural sector. When it comes to cutting-edge innovation, few sectors can compete with the arms sector.
Volvo, Ericsson, Vattenfall, Skanska, Hennes & Mauritz, Electrolux, Volvo Personvagnar, Preem, TeliaSonera, Sandvik, ICA, Atlas Copco, Nordea, Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget, Scania, Securitas, Nordstjernan, SKF, ABB Norden Holding, and Sony Mobile Communications AB were among the 20 largest Sweden-
LKAB, a state-owned mining firm predominantly operating in the country’s northern regions, holds the largest proportion of the Swedish mining market.
About 4.5 million people live in the country and work full-time, with roughly a third possessing some sort of post-secondary education. In 2006, the country had the world’s ninth-highest GDP per worker, at US$31, behind only Spain (US$22) and the United States (US$35). The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) claims that deregulation, globalization, and the expansion of the technology sector have all contributed to rising productivity.
The overall economy’s GDP per hour is growing by 2 12 percent each year, while trade-terms-balanced productivity is expanding by 2 percent. When compared to other Western European countries, Sweden’s pension funding issues pale in comparison to the rest of the world.
Although there are certain well-known issues, the Swedish labor market has been more adaptable recently. After the tax wedge, the ordinary worker keeps only 40% of their pay.
Although taxation as a share of GDP has been falling, it was still roughly double that of the United States or Ireland in 2007. The percentage of the Swedish workforce that is made up of civil servants is significantly higher than that of many other countries. Since the reforms of the early 1990s, the manufacturing sector, and by extension the economy as a whole, has grown rapidly.
Sweden World Trade Records
In terms of global competitiveness in 2012–13, the World Economic Forum ranked Sweden fourth. In terms of economic freedom, Sweden is ranked 10th among 43 European countries and 21st overall in 2012. Since the Swedish private sector is so productive, it received a high ranking in the IMD Competitiveness Yearbook 2008, placing Sweden in ninth place.
Sweden is expected to become a talent magnet for the world’s most purposeful workers after being named as having the best creativity in Europe for business in the book The Flight of the Creative Class by U.S. urban studies professor Richard Florida of the University of Toronto. The book created an index to evaluate the three forms of creativity (talent, technology, and tolerance) it argues are most beneficial to businesses.
In 2007, R&D spending accounted for more than 3.5 percent of Sweden’s GDP. This is the highest among OECD members and far surpasses that of a number of MEDCs, including the United States.
Sweden voted against adopting the Euro in a referendum in 2003, and the country still uses the krona as its official currency (SEK). The Swedish Riksbank, the oldest central bank in the world, has been in operation since 1668, and its present concentration is on maintaining price stability at an annual inflation rate of 2%.
Sweden’s average inflation rate is among the lowest in Europe because to the country’s early adoption of globalization and deregulation since the mid-1990s, according to the OECD’s Economic Survey of Sweden 2007.
Germany, the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, Denmark, and Finland account for the bulk of commerce.
Since the catastrophic recession of the early 1990s, the economic outlook for Sweden has improved dramatically. In spite of a slowdown in growth between 2001 and 2003, the economy has since picked up steam, growing by an average of 3.7% annually over the past few years.
Growth is expected to continue in the long run. Inflation is modest and expected to remain so for the next two to three years.
The export industry has been flourishing since the mid-1990s, driving overall economic expansion.
The strength of Swedish exports has also been unexpected. Swedish exports are now more resilient to global fluctuations thanks to a dramatic transformation in the structure of exports, with services, the IT industry, and telecommunications now taking the lead from more traditional export industries like steel, paper, and pulp.
While the cost of imported goods has increased, Sweden’s industrial sector has seen a decline in export revenue. From 1995 to 2003, export prices were lowered by 4% while import prices increased by 11%. In the end, it led to a 13% decline in Sweden’s terms of trade.
Rising home prices and rising consumer mortgage debt prompted lawmakers, economists, and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to sound the alarm in 2014.
As the ratio of household debt to income surpassed 170%, the IMF urged lawmakers to consider zoning reform and other measures of generating a higher supply of homes to meet rising demand. In August 2014, 40 percent of mortgage holders were benefiting from interest-only loans, while the remaining 60 percent were making principal payments so slowly that they would take 100 years to settle.